administrative jihad up close and personal

as chairman of the senate foreign relations subcommittee on european affairs, which has important jurisdiction over nato and therefore is critical to military activities in afghanistan, barack obama has failed to hold even one hearing as chairman. he's virtually done nothing in that position. now talk about 'administrative jihad' - i believe that would be considered a win in al qaeda's eyes. ( SOURCE 1, SOURCE 2, SOURCE 3. )

islamic jihad in the west must sometimes put on a 'respectable face' if it wants a deep foothold, especially so when it comes to the western political arena .. and do so deceptively. ( "taqiyya, or dissimulation, is a form of deception which muslims use to conceal the truth. this islamic concept to deceive an enemy (i.e., non-muslim, infidel, kafir, etc.) is not only a common practice, but is considered a virtue among muslims." SOURCE 4. ) with all the terrorist and islam-sympathizing associations barack obama has that the media has so successfully brought to light, one can only think barack obama is actually helping the extremist islamic cause. these associations include william ayers (a confessed american terrorist, who on the very day of 911 said he didn't do enough bombings, with whom barack obama held organizational meetings in his house, which fox news' sean hannity is diligently exposing), his former church pastor rev. jeremiah wright and louis farrakhan (who both visited moammar qaddafi in libya, also a known terrorist), and raila odinga of kenya (who in an agreement with the islamic community was ready to hand over portions of kenya to islamic sharia law had he been elected). these are intentional associations. barack obama could have chosen not to 'be friendly' with william ayers. he could have chosen a different church to attend. he could have chosen not to support and campaign for raila odinga in kenya. is barack obama the 'respectable face' of islamic jihad in the west, and getting away with it? it's not as if there's no evidence for such an allegation, considering the aforementioned associations. and when considering obama's muslim background, a red flag comes up. come on now, it's exercising god-given common sense to ask such questions. if you are well read, you'd know that the following prominent journalists and politicians are trying very hard to expose obama for the 'trojan horse' he just may be: sean hannity (fox) ( SOURCE 5 ), bill o'reilly (fox) ( SOURCE 6 ), ann coulter ( SOURCE 7 ), george stephanopoulos (abc) ( SOURCE 8 ), congressman steve king (iowa) ( SOURCE 9 ) and newt gingrich ( SOURCE 10. ) they all want to know who barack obama really is .. that is, what these bizarre associations of his, which are all confirmed and factual, really tell us about his motives.

i'm a formerly-excited obama supporter who completely changed my mind about him after discovering a few disturbing things. the first was about barack obama's activity in kenya, which is the theme of this post. the second was a host of other things, but because those are getting such good press, i won't go into that pandora's jar. and the third is how i became a bit suspicious at how masses of people were worked up by his inspirational speeches, but with little knowledge of what they were supporting or thorough knowledge of their candidate ( yes that was a good description of your's truly. ) during one interview of 'hardball's' chris matthews of msnbc with senator kirk watson, chris matthews insisted repeatedly that the senator name one legislative accomplishment of barack obama's, and the senator could not. ( SOURCE 11. )

after other revelations like that i realized that many people were under the spell of barack obama's 'inspirational speeches' ( deceptive rhetoric is the better description ) and yet knew nearly nothing of what he stood for, or of his background. this was also fueled by the unfair media advantage he had early on. so i've spent the last few months researching, and from that i've taken a complete 180 degree reversal in my view of barack obama. it's scary and disconcerting how ignorant, naive and exploitable the american people are under the spell of one person's speaking skills. i think the only reason obama has so much support is because a lot of his supporters are in the dark (as i once was) to certain very important issues that would totally expose him as having extremely questionable intentions for our country.

there's one barack obama issue however that stands out above all others to me. and other people who know about it share a legitimate concern. and that is his presence in kenya and his support for raila odinga.

this concern goes way beyond barack obama's muslim roots, muslims in his family and the predominantly muslim schools he attended when he was younger ( pre-hawaii ). his roots pale in comparison to his actions. and those actions are this: in august of 2006 he supported and actually campaigned for raila odinga of kenya. odinga, the leader of the orange democratic movement ( odm ), was running against president mwai kibaki in general elections, a well publicized event. were raila odinga to have been elected president ( he lost ), he would have set up islamic sharia law in 'muslim-declared' areas of kenya in an agreement he made with the muslim community there. yes, raila odinga signed a document promising the handing over of portions of his country to the muslim community, and the evangelical alliance of kenya, to expose this activity, has had this document posted on the web for a while now ( SOURCE 12. ) so the question is, why would an american senator be supporting the setting up of islamic sharia law, especially post-911? how out of touch and ignorant can one person possibly be with respect to knowledge of odinga's agreement with the islamic community? considering obama's and odinga's very close relationship and family ties, this 'ignorance' is very unlikely. for whatever reason obama supported and campaigned for odinga - be it obama's close relationship to odinga, or the fact that they are family, or perhaps lingering muslim sentiments on obama's part ( we really do not know actually ), the fact is he did, and to me it's all quite disturbing. it's a very very precarious place to be for someone running for president of the united states, and on top of that, post-911. such activities don't procure a whole lot of trust from me for barack obama. call me cautious, call me patriotic, call me someone with common sense, it just doesn't look good. it probably can be compared to former president jimmy carter's recent meeting with hamas leader khaled meshal, and hamas we all know is one of many organizations the united states considers a major terrorist threat. ( SOURCE 13. ) barack obama's support of raila odinga is not too far off from this.

how do we know obama supported odinga during his august 2006 visit? the evidence is strong. for one, obama criticized president kibaki's administration of corruption virtually daily in various rallies and appearances in nairobi. in this VIDEO obama is seen with raila odinga in a few appearances engaging in such support. ( SOURCE 14. ) it reports that "odinga's been at obama's elbow here fairly often and is a member of the obama family's luo tribe." cbs 2 journalist mike flannery also adds: "after remaining largely silent, the government of president mwai kibaki is beginning to respond, suggesting that obama may have fallen under the spell of opposition leader raila odinga." so the polarization is apparent: president mwai kibaki versus his opponent raila odinga with barack obama by his side. mike flannery continues, noting a statement by kenyan government official alfred mutua: "sen. obama has to look at critically about where he's receiving his advice from," said government spokesman dr. alfred mutua. "just because somebody, somewhere wants to run for president and is using sen. obama as his stooge, as his puppet to be able to get to where he wants to get to." ( SOURCE 15. )

there's a reason why obama's support of raila odinga is so disturbing. odinga's 'mou' (memorandum of understanding) agreement with the national muslim leaders forum (namlef) directly ties odinga to a controversial handing over of his government to islamic sharia law. that's disturbing enough for obvious reasons. a blend of a democratic-based way of government with a sharia law-based way of government does not work. they are vastly different rules of law and ways of life. saudi arabia and libya for instance, two sharia law-based governments, are notorious for human rights abuses, as stipulated by the u.s. department of state. ( SOURCE 16, saudi arabia, SOURCE 17, libya. ) you may as well be living in the middle ages or the stone age there. kenya is a relatively established and strong democratic country, a pillar of democracy and economic stability for that whole region of africa. it strongly supports american efforts to fight terrorism in that area of the world. this is confirmed by u.s. state department briefs on kenya as well. ( SOURCE 18 ) so were odinga to have won the presidential election, kenyan democracy would have fallen into sharia rule and would have unstablized that entire region of africa, seeing al-qaida already has strongholds in neighboring sudan, somalia and in algeria to the north.

this points out a clear flaw in foreign policy judgement on barack obama's part. lynn sweet, a chicago sun-times columnist, traveled to kenya and witnessed obama first hand: "i was there when obama delivered a lecture on corruption intended for the ears of kibaki, a member of the kikuyu tribe." she went on to comment on the situation: "i understand obama has to be careful because while he is one of the most credible figures the united states has to deal with kenya, the dispute between odinga and kibaki is mired in tribal politics. obama, very aware that kenyans may see him as a luo in this context, does not want to be seen as taking sides." ( SOURCE 19. ) but the fact is he did take sides, he went out of his way to take sides and spent a good portion of his kenyan tour criticizing kibaki's administration. ( SOURCE 20. ) the kenyan government in fact issued a letter to barack obama after his tour, where the kenyan ambassador (designate) to the us, mr peter oginga ogego stated in part: "i hereby wish to communicate to you the displeasure and disappointment of the government of kenya, (kenyan) embassy in washington dc, and majority of kenyans, with regards to your recent utterances while in kenya. your unprovoked and uncalled for statements were in bad taste...you deliberately, without real cause or reason, other than what appears (to be) to seek cheap publicity and inconsequential populism, chose to publicly attack the democratically elected government of kenya...rather than appreciate and even encourage the gallant and heroic efforts that our government and kenyans have put in dismantling the deeply embedded networks and chains of corruption, you carelessly, in a manner akin to political activism, chose to trash and sneer at us" columnist lynn sweet correctly points out that the odinga and kibaki rivalry has much to do with tribal issues, odinga's luo tribe being the oppressed minority, while kibaki's kikuyu tribe is the elite and privileged one. therefore did barack obama, out of an emotional pull to his luo tribe heritage, set aside sound judgement (that is, promote the greater welfare of kenyan democracy) and instead focus on tribal and family welfare? just look at the results of odinga's election loss .. mass murder and the ravaging of kenya. and it was tribal-based as well. what can we learn from this about obama's foreign policy judgement? he very well could have contributed to exacerbating tribal tensions by taking sides with odinga by very clearly criticizing president kibaki's administration, a government already successfully democratic. clearly, had odinga won, and the memorandum of understanding been implemented, kenyan government would have fallen into sharia law. can you imagine obama making the same judgement mistakes in both domestic and foreign policy as an american president? he's clearly a novice, who at least in this instance set aside the greater good of kenya in order to pursue tribal and family politics. obama's popularity in kenya could have even emboldened kenyan's to defend their luo tribe and riot and pillage after it was declared that odinga had lost the election.

cbs 2 journalist mike flannery's and chicago sun-times columnist lynn sweet's kenyan tours with barack obama have many insights, and show beyond a doubt that obama did indeed takes sides with raila odinga.

to be clear, obama's visit to odinga in kenya was in august 2006, and the agreement odinga made with the muslim community was signed by odinga in august 2007, but that does not mean obama was not aware of odinga's electoral deal with the kenyan islamic community, which talks were no doubt going on for a while, way before it was signed. considering the VERY CLOSE RELATIONSHIP BARACK OBAMA HAS WITH RAILA ODINGA, chances are obama knew in 2006 what was going down. obama may have even counseled raila odinga in the matter. we may never know, but as obama supporters are always keen to point out, barack obama is sharp, so he was probably aware of odinga's talks with the islamic community pre-2007. one thing is sure however, you'd never find senator's clinton and mccain doing such foolish things. foolish is not an accurate word, it's more like 'anti-everything-america-stands-for'. and even after the signing of this document by odinga in august 2007, obama STILL has close ties with him. ( SOURCE 21. ) so if he didn't know then, he certainly knows now. and there is no public statement on obama's part repudiating odinga's sharia law sympathizing activity in kenya. this seems to be a recurring theme with barack obama, clear ties to people connected to anti-american activities, some of which include louis farrakhan ( given a lifetime achievement award by obama's church, the leader of the nation of islam, a known racist and supporter of terrorists like moammar kadafi of libya, whom he visited once ), and william ayers ( a confessed american terrorist, which story is being diligently reported by fox new's show 'hannity and colmes', and made a prominent issue by debate moderator george stephanopoulos in the recent april 16th abc news democratic debate between senators clinton and obama. )

it's well known that obama often talks to odinga even while on the democratic presidential campaign trail. i'm assuming all obama supporters want to continue thinking of their candidate as well-informed, astute, sharp, and on top of everything. well then, continue thinking that, because if he really is, then chances are he was never in the dark about odinga's talks with the islamic community and the document in question.

on facbook, i've seen wall posts and discussion groups deleted by group ADMINS of obama supporting groups. apparently they can't defend their candidate in the face of 'sensitive' information, i.e., obama's activity in kenya. it's a definite achilles' heel ( weakness ) in the obama camp, as they should be able to intelligently defend their candidate in the face of sensitive information, not run from it.

HERE IS THE PRIMARY EVIDENCE:

) ) ) a picture of barack obama supporting and campaigning for raila odinga during his 2006 visit to kenya: SOURCE 22.
) ) ) a youtube video of barack obama supporting and campaigning for raila odinga during his 2006 visit to kenya: SOURCE 23.
) ) ) the evangelical alliance of kenya posted a document that outlines odinga's agreement with the muslim community: SOURCE 24.
) ) ) a youtube video confirms in a kenyan press conference that raila odinga signed an agreement with the kenyan islamic community: SOURCE 25.

in the document posted by the evangelical alliance of kenya you'll clearly see an agreement to hand over portions of kenya to islamic sharia law. it doesn't merely acknowledge islam, it stipulates, more or less, the re-writing of the kenyan constitution in 'muslim-declared' areas, giving sharia law preeminence in government laws, in the courts, and even in the way people lead their private lives ( including tourists ), a document odinga fully supports, as he signed it. it allows for the indoctrination of children and ban's christian open-air and radio preaching. AND TO REMIND YOU, BARACK OBAMA SUPPORTED AND CAMPAIGNED FOR RAILA ODINGA. here are excerpts from that document:

a) whereas the candidate - who recognizes islam as the only true religion - is seeking to become the next president of the republic of kenya
b) the council of islamic leaders shall be permitted to have an oversight role to monitor activities of all other religions and any applications for religious activities and institutions will require their approval. they shall have the right to deny approval to cults and other evil practices.
c) within 6 months re-write the constitution of kenya to recognize shariah as the only true law sanctioned by the holy quran for muslim declared regions
d) with immediate effect dismiss the commissioner of police who has allowed himself to be used by heathens and zionists to oppress the kenyan muslim community
e) disband the imperialist anti-terror police unit (atpu) that was set up for the sole purpose of terrorizing, harassing, intimidating and deporting kenyan muslims to guantanamo bay
f) no muslim residing in kenya whether a citizen, visitor or relative of any of the above shall be subjected to any process involving the laws of a foreign country and in particular any muslim arrested for or suspected of terrorism or any other international crime shall only be tried within the borders of kenya and shall be granted a competent lawyer of his/her choice at the expense of the government
g) within 1 year facilitate the establishment of a shariah court in every kenyan divisional headquarters
h) popularize islam, the only true religion, in the coast and north eastern regions by ordering every primary school in kenya in the regions to conduct daily madrassa classes
i) impose a total ban on open-air gospel crusades by worshippers of the cross in the coast and north eastern regions
j) outlaw gospel programs (preaching, purported faith healing, etc) on kbc, the national broadcaster
k) impose a total ban on the public consumption of alcoholic beverages in the coast and north eastern regions and their towns of mombasa, lamu, garissa, wajir, mandera, kwale, vanga, lunga lunga, and all other muslim populated urban centres of kenya whose population is at least 40% (forty percent) muslim
l) impose an immediate ban on women's public dressing styles that are considered immoral and offensive to the muslim faith in the muslim regions of the coast and north eastern regions. this ban will apply to muslims and non-muslims alike, in these regions and will include all visitors whether domestic or foreign tourists.
m) namlef and it's affiliate organizations shall issue a joint statement declaring that all muslims should support and vote for raila amollo odinga and odm
n) in addition, namlef have impressed upon najib balala who is present herein that he should step down in favor of raila odinga in the presidential nomination exercise within odm, due to the fact that raila odinga has confirmed support for all the aspirations of the jimbo la pwani and the kenyan muslim community.

were odinga to have won, his new government would have clearly and severely curtailed basic human rights and freedoms, and would have brought kenya into a dark ages, as islamic nations are well known to do. ( saudi arabia and libya, two muslim nations, are NOTORIOUS for human rights violations, documented here in united states department of state reviews: SOURCE 26, saudi arabia, SOURCE 27, libya. ) perhaps obama should have read the fine print of the above document, but being a harvard law school graduate, and the sharp candidate we all know that he is, i'm sure he did. supposedly he doesn't miss a beat. why has raila odinga succumbed to the islamic pressure? THE GREATER QUESTION IS, WHAT IS BARACK OBAMA DOING THERE SUPPORTING ODINGA? and the obama camp says barack obama has superior judgement. that's not showing in this case. can you imagine senators clinton or mccain in kenya entangled with an appearance of supporting the handing over portions of kenya to sharia law?

obama makes lots of people uncomfortable with activities like these. i hope voters don't throw away common sense. but then again, how can they throw away their common sense if they are UNAWARE of obama's activities in kenya? that's right, they simply don't know. and the facebook obama supporters are going out of their way to make sure such information is not posted very long on wall posts and discussion groups .. they chase after and delete them furiously. the american patriot abraham lincoln said: "you can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time." welcome to the world of big politics, the deceptive rhetoric of barack obama and the cowardly policies of some of his supporters.

the reason why resisting obama's islam-supporting activities in kenya is so important is because the extremist islam community knows that if they can gain a foothold in merely a few 'muslim-declared regions' in kenya and establish sharia law there, then they can continue to do it again and again, until the entire country and people's freedom is overrun with their oppressive, narrow views and laws. and what of the kenyans who are not muslim living in those regions? because islam is notorious at enforcing sharia law it would only result in oppression of non-muslims and most likely MORE VIOLENCE would erupt in kenya as we have already sadly seen. even though that violence was reported as tribal-based as a result of the election odinga lost, it'd be idiotic to rule out muslim/christian reactions to the lost election. whatever the root of the violence has been - tribal or religious, a fresh source of violence is definitely not needed in kenya. ( SOURCE 28: 'mob burns kenyans seeking refuge in church'. )

if you think the spread of islamic sharia law is not happening or even possible in the WEST, guess again. it is happening. it's happening in europe as we speak. this short clip is well worth the time to watch ( SOURCE 29. ) the other videos can be found where it says 'posted by: patcondell' to the right of his video. i'd highly encourage watching his series of videos for the sake of knowing what exactly extremist islam is up to in europe.

so, the larger picture now.

as stated earlier, i was excited about barack obama early in his campaign, then started doing my 'homework' - internet research, cross-referencing the news networks ( cnn, msnbc and fox ), blogs, etc., and found out about his connections to islam, in particular, supporting raila odinga in kenya. and the church obama attends and supports does not help his cause either, because it is extremely ethnocentric and promotes ethnic economic separatism, which COMPLETELY CONTRADICTS his message of being bipartisan and reaching across ethnic, cultural, economic and religious boundaries. ( SOURCE 30: 'obama's church', the investor's business daily. ) i considered his muslim upbringing as well. then i thought, well ok, he's saying one thing and doing another, not being honest. that's clear now, and is pretty common in big politics. what a disappointment. so it stands to reason that if he is muslim but not being transparent about it, then perhaps he's practicing 'taqiyya', or deception for whatever motive. 'taqiyya' is 'holy deception' and is considered virtuous in islam if the deception and lying in question promotes islam ( SOURCE 31. ) will we ever know? the better question may be is there even time for thinking about it as obama continues to gain the support of ignorant american voters? meaning, we don't have time to think - i'm taking the position that he is indeed muslim. it's a safe calculated risk, something military intelligence in the field must deal with all the time - that is, there is never 'perfect intelligence' ( information about the enemy ). military decisions are therefore based on the best intelligence they have at that moment in time, and it's always a risk when engaging an enemy on limited military intelligence. but the decision has to be made. the concern that obama is muslim with questionable motives is on the minds of lots of people. just search google and you'll see for yourself ( SOURCE 32. ) it's not like such allegations are baseless, because these allegations arise naturally when considering his roots, and when considering his activities in kenya. we have a right to know, considering he is running for the highest office in the land. we cannot merely assume he is not muslim. that is a dangerous position to hold, considering all the significant evidence to the contrary. if barack obama is secretly muslim is he initiating a first step toward a greater islamic rule that is the goal of all muslims worldwide, which is taught and encouraged in the koran? to be successful at this obama would have to be 'flying under the radar' and appear as someone he is not. ( already happening, as the media recently established. ) that is, he must be deceptive. he would have to gain ground one little step at a time, on the grassroots level. is he getting away with it? well, no he is not. the media found out recently about his former church pastor rev. jeremiah wright's racist and separatist views, which compared to barack obama's rhetoric of 'bringing people together' totally exposed him as deceptive. obama is a clear hypocrite. on the other hand, people still support him, but only because his base of supporters he's won through persuasive speeches are innocent and unaware of what he may truly stand for. either that or they are just plain stupid. on what foundation do people believe barack obama's speeches? the media just exposed him as being deceptive, which is well documented. he has little experience in government. he has muslim roots. he associates himself with those of anti-american sentiment. ( SOURCE 33. ) it's an era of post-911. and amidst these warning signs people still believe everything he says.

i believe many voters obama popularly appeals to simply don't know the facts of his background, in particular his recent activity in kenya. in facebook, wall posts and discussion boards in obama-supporting groups attempting to reveal this sensitive information have been repeatedly deleted. sound familiar? the obama camp refused to debate hillary in north carolina on april 27. perhaps that was due to how the april 16th abc news debate turned out, where thanks to abc anchor george stephanopoulos obama's association with william ayers ( that the obama camp doesn't want people to know about ) is finally coming to light. ( SOURCE 34, four pages of debate transcripts, the william ayers question is on page two. ) yes obama is not only deceptive, but is now running from the truth. and some of his supporters on facebook can't defend their candidate in the face of the fact that obama campaigned for raila odinga in august 2006, a man who was prepared to hand over 'muslim-declared' areas of kenya to islamic sharia law were he to be elected president of kenya.

i'd recommend checking out what's happening in the netherlands, in particular the work of dutch parliamentarian geert wilders. he's recognized the damage radical islam and sharia law is doing to the netherlands, so much so that he created a 15 minute film called 'fitna' that puts radical islam's activities in europe in the spotlight ( SOURCE 35 ), which generated worldwide muslim resistance. geert wilders gave a speech to the dutch parliament on march 11 2008, which reveals his motivation for making the film ( SOURCE 36. )

another front is the UK, london in particular, where islam is literally taking over that city and country little piece by piece. muslims take up almost 12% of the population of london, and i believe about 2.5% of the UK. there are lots of tensions in the country because of it. muslims think europe is vulnerable so it's on the move there, not so much with bombs and other forms of terrorism ( which they do use ), but via sharia law. in the UK for example, islamic sharia law is slowly being integrated into british government, yes that's right, the laws are literally being changed as we speak. it's all over the internet so it is well documented. video blog posts by pat condell will bring you up to speed - they are kind of humorous actually ( SOURCE 37. ) according to him, the situation is pretty bad there.

first of all any muslim leading a peaceful, virtuous life i support and they should be honored. i cherish people who love virtue and have the peaceful lives to prove it. it's the others that mess things up for them and the name of islam. it's scary how on a grassroots level islamic sharia law is slowly changing society in the UK. for instance, according to pat condell ( SOURCE 38 ), all kinds of accommodations are being made in british law to cater to the islamic way of life, like polygamy, or arranged marriages of young teen girls to old people. and then there's the issue of education, where the british government is funding the building of hundreds of islam-based schools throughout the country. pat condell says this is being done so the labor party doesn't lose votes in areas of the country where islamic population is dense. he calls them spineless government officials, opting for short-term gain, but long term erosion of society, unless of course you want an islamic society. ( not i. ) so this is why i'm highly concerned about barack obama's islamic roots, his islamic-supporting activity in kenya, his church ties to louis farrakhan ( the leader of the nation of islam ), and on top of that his radically liberal views and policies .. THE most liberal in washington supposedly. ( SOURCE 39: some of these liberal policies can be found here: 'beyond obama's beauty', by kenneth blackwell. ) what's happening in the UK is all right there in black and white in the media, no fabricated crazy blog stuff. i don't want it in my country, where i live however, and that's why i'm vigilant in exposing barack obama. i leave the option of obama trying to 'fly under the radar' with muslim sentiments open. why? because it's an exercise of my god-given common sense. senators mccain and clinton, in comparison, are both hero's and patriots among us for their already proven and distinguished service to our country. we can trust them. we can sleep at night knowing we'll be safe if they were in the white house. we know they won't try to radically change an already strong and prosperous america. ( and i might add they don't have muslim roots, and don't associate themselves with anti-american sympathizers. )

were barack obama to be elected president of the united states, the division of power in our system of government more or less safeguards against single person rule that medieval europe was all about. oddly enough ancient rome and greece gave us democracy which was divinely inspired, but then somehow, some way civilization in the west slowly degraded into kings and lords and surfs and the dark ages. it'd be a good study to examine how that actually happened. ( SOURCE 40. ) but i think i know how it did. although the decay of roman and greek society had no single cause, one significant one undoubtedly was judeo-islamic-christianity. little by little, it gained public support behind the scenes, eroding the roman empire mind by mind, allegiance by allegiance, action by action. ( 'grassroots' we call that today. ) THAT is why i'm so vigilant in both exposing and resisting barack obama. his islamic roots and activities don't scream pro-western values, AT ALL. you can't support the handing over of portions of kenya to islamic sharia law and still consider yourself an american. barack obama is not the man people think he is. seeing what is happening in the UK with the 'infestation' of islamic sharia rule being woven into every aspect of life there - government laws, funding islamic-based schools, making provisions for muslims to live in polygamy legally, among countless other provisions it is attempting, it makes me think that barack obama would have the same kind of eroding influence with not only his suspected islamic motives but also with his extremely liberal policies, including his being a total novice to foreign policy ( yes obama is the one who wants to invade nuclear weapon-owning pakistan .. now that is a foreign policy NOVICE we don't need in the white house. ) considering the democratic and civilized ancient roman and greek way of life DID fall and the west WAS plunged into the dark ages, that fact makes me that much more vigilant to make sure it does not happen here in the usa. shockingly however that is exactly what is happening in europe with islam on the grassroots level, not overnight but it's steady and not stopping. it's scary. barack obama is so popular because he gets away with being popular, taking advantage of and exploiting people's ignorance on the grassroots level.

i want everyone to listen to this again, said by a man enshrined in the lincoln memorial national monument: "you can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time."

in summary, we have to be extremely vigilant in maintaining our freedom. sometimes the most dangerous enemies of a free society are not bombs, but 'fly under the radar' activities by deceptive individuals, which includes the winning of minds deceptively, political pressure and the exploiting of as many innocent ( or corrupt ) people and institutions as possible. what is going on in the netherlands, the UK and europe in general is a perfect example. a free society is not eroded by huge events, but by little events, on the grassroots level, drip by drip so-to-speak of water leaking out of a barrel, until sooner or later the barrel is empty of all it's water. this is what extremist islam knows, and it will take african countries, it will take european countries and it will even take america little by little instead of in big chunks. so take note of what barack obama has done and is doing in kenya. then take note that the media has exposed him as saying one thing yet doing another. and be mindful that his speeches lack a sharp edge or specific message. yes we hear him say 'hope and change', but i don't trust him. it's "an eloquent but empty call for change" so aptly put by republican party presidential nominee senator mccain. we don't need 'hope and change'. millions come to america for exactly that reason, that is, we ALREADY STAND FOR HOPE AND CHANGE. we don't need a radical departure from it, as obama espouses. we're currently defending ourselves in a war on three fronts - the mideast, afghanistan and terrorists cells worldwide - that radical islam initiated in september 11 2001, which war barack obama vehemently opposes. and he's been in kenya behind the scenes supporting and campaigning for raila odinga, who was prepared to hand over portions of kenya to islamic sharia law. this is fact. and that is enough for me to not vote for barack obama. it's clear he's got a lot going on behind the scenes that the average american has no idea about. he has muslim roots. come on now, lets exercise some god-given common sense.

SOURCES REVIEW:

1
new ad: hillary promises never to be too busy to defend our national security
SOURCE 1

2
"he (obama) chairs the subcommittee on europe. ... he's held not one substantive hearing to do oversight."
SOURCE 2

3
obama absent at afghanistan hearings
SOURCE 3

4
taqqiyah & jihad (deception & holy war)
SOURCE 4

5
sean hannity (fox): obama's friend bill ayers - ge problem to come
SOURCE 5

6
bill o'reilly (fox): o'reilly on abc debate, exposes obama and far-left cowards
SOURCE 6

7
ann coulter: obama campaign gives up on finding 'mr. wright'
SOURCE 7

8
george stephanopoulos (abc): 1 of 10 - abc democratic debate from philadelphia, pa - 4/16
SOURCE 8

9
congressman steve king (iowa): al-qaeda dancing in the streets if barack obama is elected president?
SOURCE 9

10
newt gingrich: newt on carter and obama
SOURCE 10

11
chris matthews' interview with senator kirk watson, "name one legislative accomplishment of barack obama"
SOURCE 11

12
the evangelical alliance of kenya's posting of raila odinga's agreement with the islamic community to set up islamic sharia law in kenya upon his election as president
SOURCE 12

13
former president jimmy carter's recent meeting with hamas leader khaled meshal
SOURCE 13

14
obama's criticism irks kenyan government - government says obama is a stooge for political opposition
SOURCE 14

15
obama's criticism irks kenyan government - government says obama is a stooge for political opposition
SOURCE 15

16
notorious human rights violations of saudi arabia reported by the u.s. department of state
SOURCE 16

17
notorious human rights violations of libya reported by the u.s. department of state
SOURCE 17

18
u.s. policy in the horn of africa
SOURCE 18

19
u.s. policy in the horn of africa
SOURCE 19

20
envoy hits at obama over graft remark
SOURCE 20

21
barack obama has a close relationship with raila odinga
SOURCE 21

22
a picture of barack obama supporting and campaigning for raila odinga during his 2006 visit to kenya
SOURCE 22

23
a youtube video of barack obama supporting and campaigning for raila odinga during his 2006 visit to kenya
SOURCE 23

24
the evangelical alliance of kenya's posting of raila odinga's agreement with the islamic community to set up islamic sharia law in kenya upon his election as president
SOURCE 24

25
a youtube video confirms in a kenyan press conference that raila odinga signed an agreement with the kenyan islamic community
SOURCE 25

26
notorious human rights violations of saudi arabia reported by the u.s. department of state
SOURCE 26

27
notorious human rights violations of libya reported by the u.s. department of state
SOURCE 27

28
'mob burns kenyans seeking refuge in church'
SOURCE 28

29
'a word to islamofascists', by pat condell
SOURCE 29

30
'obama's church', by the investor's business daily
SOURCE 30

31
'holy deception' is considered virtuous in islam if the deception and lying in question promotes islam
SOURCE 31

32
others suspect barack obama is practicing 'taqiyya', or 'holy deception' for the sake of islam
SOURCE 32

33
association with those of anti-american sentiment
SOURCE 33

34
the april 16 abc news clinton/obama debate transcript (the william ayers question is on page two)
SOURCE 34

35
a 15 minute film by dutch parliamentarian geert wilders called 'fitna' that puts radical islam in the spotlight
SOURCE 35

36
geert wilders' speech to the dutch parliament, which reveals his motivation for making the film 'fitna'
SOURCE 36

37
a list of videos by pat condell
SOURCE 37

38
how islamic sharia law is being written into british law and changing british society in a negative way
SOURCE 38

39
'beyond obama's beauty', by kenneth blackwell of the new york sun
SOURCE 39

40
how did greek and roman civilization fall? ( google query )
SOURCE 40

keep up with raila odinga and kenya news HERE.

.

.

other popular posts

»  taxes - understanding the tax plans: mccain versus obama, or, creation of wealth and jobs versus money handouts and inspiring laziness
»  acorn - despite a revision, obama's fight the smears site still hides the fact that he trained ACORN leaders
»  joe the plumber - joe the plumber helps obama define his socialist economic policy
»  administrative jihad in the usa - senator obama, why does it appear you are administratively assisting al-qaeda and worldwide terrorism?
»  administrative jihad abroad - administrative jihad up close and personal
»  global jihad - a global jihad without guns or military conquest described by libyan muammar gaddafi himself